In other words, religion needs media. With the development
of media (from written word to electronic media etc), religions also change.
Media influences religious change (Hjavard, 2008). For example, nowadays many
religious groupings utilise electronic media to foreground the physical
presence of religious leaders and to communicate religious news and religious
content (e.g. the Bible can be found online etc.). Weibel (2011) states that media
is “essentially the technical redemption of the religious promise (p.41).”
It is interesting to think of technical media as taking on
the promise of eternal life, a promise of religions. In other words, all media basically
adopts the religious promise as a medium. According to the article, religion is
the “original medium of all media” (Weibel, 2011, p.41). It is strange, yet
somewhat logical to develop the thought that all mediated life has developed because
of religion as a medium. Was the computer, and its hard drive, invented from the
religious promise of immortality of the soul? Were airplanes and hovercraft
vessels developed due to a religious promise of antigravity phenomena such as
prophets walking on water? Can scientists convert various substances using
chemistry because Jesus could turn water into wine? What would the world be
like if there was never any religion?
Due to secularization, there has been a loss of religion in
the traditional sense (Weibel, 2011, p.42). Media utilises religious traits,
such as the phenomena of repetition, to create a sense of media religiousness.
For example, watching your favourite television show every night or checking
Facebook every morning when you wake up are untraditional mediated religious
rituals. A second form of media utilising religion as a medium, or
characteristic, is art. Art “acts as if it were a religion (Weibel, 2011, p.43).”
The artist becomes some sort of “god,” a being of creation. Thus, art becomes a
rival of religion. However, it takes on religious characteristics to become, in
its own sense, a “popular” religion. Hjavard (2008), states that the concept of
a popular religion reflects on how religion blurs into popular culture. In this
case, religion and spirituality merges into the lives of everyday artists,
where art has taken on the role of religion (Elkins, 2007). Therefore, art and
other forms of the media can be substitute religions.
Religion needs the media and the media needs religion.
References:
Elkins, J. 2007. Bridging the Gap Between Modern Art and
Religion. Artstyle Blog, Nov 30. Received
from: http://www.chicagoarts-lifestyle.com/cac-perspectives-can-modern-art-and-religion-get-along/#more-660
Hjarvard, S. 2008. The Mediatization of Religion: A Theory
of the Media as Agents of Religious Change. Northern
Lights. 6(1). (RL)
Weibel, P. 2011. Religion as a Medium – the Media of
Religion. In B Groys and P. Weibel, Eds., Medium
Religion: Faith, Geopolitics, Art. 30-43. Kȍln: Verlag der Buchhandlung, Walther Kȍnig.
Image Source:
My own image.
No comments:
Post a Comment